Should Art Museums Always Be Free? There's Room for Debate
go to article
If the argument for access to museums' collections is taken from a humanistic point of view, then charging for entry would be indefensible. Especially, as pointed out in this article:
"Museums speak of wanting to attract larger, more democratic audiences. They cannot even begin to know this audience, much less accommodate it, until they lower the barriers, at least to their permanent collections."Roberta Smith goes on in the article to list, surprisingly, a number of American museums which stand by the principle of free access. This echoed the earlier attempt across in the UK to do away with entrance fees which saw a corresponding rise in visitorship numbers by as much as 72% in the first year (see earlier post here).
Putting it another way, mission must not be diluted in the pursuit of the bottomline. In fact, Smith argues that:
"If museums were to broadcast unequivocally that their first priority is art and the public's contact with art, their public image would improve and sharpen. And other things about them would start to change, from the people who sit on their boards, to the buildings they build."It would be most prudent that museums not forget their social mission, even as they woo the evermore "sophisticated audience" (see earlier related post here).